Hi, My name is Lauren and I'm a delegate from St. Francis High School. My country is Cameroon, and though I know that it's pro-whaling, I'm having a hard time figuring out much else. Cameroon gives no reasoning for its position, and I've tried looking up the other countries with similar circumstances in the IWC (Gambia and Togo) and still can't find anything. Any advice? Thanks so much, Lauren C.
Also, I just wanted to say how excited I am for BMUN. I honestly look forward to BMUN for the majority of the year, and it feels like these last months in MUN have just flown by. Anyways, Thanks Lauren C.
Glad to hear you are excited for BMUN, we are all working hard to make sure this year is amazing for the delegates, and we look forward to seeing all the new faces.
Now on to your question. To be honest many people believe that poorer countries such as Cameroon with no direct reason to have an opinion in favor of whaling are being paid off by pro-whaling countries to side with them. This has not been completely confirmed, but it is a reasonable suspicion.
That being said, there is clearly no way for you to bring this point up as a legitimate argument in favor of whaling in the BMUN debates. Instead, I would focus on a more general pro-whaling argument, such as believing countries have the right to utilize their own resources as they see fit.
Good luck with your paper, and let me know if you have any more questions.
My partner and I are impatient for this year’s debate, considering the importance of both topics at hand. Thus leading us to propose the question as to which topic we should discuss first. On a personal note, Belgium believes that we should start our committee’s discussion with the Sustainable Development of Emerging Economies. Belgium sees it’s only fitting that with the recent United Nations Climate Change Conference held in Copenhagen, Denmark there is currently ample room to discuss numerous solutions that could ultimately solve the issue at hand.
In reference to Cameroon’s concerns, Belgium believes that every country is entitled to their own opinion, in contrast to their geographic positioning. Both topics are addressing a global issue, and therefore, they must be considered by all nations, whether you are pro-whaling or not. Even though your country has had limited involvement with this issue, you can still propose solutions that will benefit all members of the United Nations.
Thank you, we are eager to hear your suggestions and thoughts,
My name is Serena Chu and my partner is Larissa Lacoix, we will be representing the nation of Cote d'ivoire. We are boh really excited to attend the conference!
Well we just wanted to give a shout out to the people in our committee as well as the chairs.
And just to start off a conversation with fellow delegates, Cote D'ivoire is stressing the importance for long term goals; not that short term and quick relief isnt important.
Thank you so much Hewa and Belgium! I really think that we should start with Whaling, but that's just because it's my topic. Serena, I'd love to comment and I completely agree, but to be honest I haven't done my research yet and that's my partner's topic. I'll have to get her to start blogging also. Does anyone have any tips for giving speeches? I'm horrible with public speaking but I'd love to improve. Also, is anyone familiar with North Gate Hall? I had committee there last year and it was such a pretty building, and I'm hoping that we'll miraculously have committee there this year too, even though UNEP is probably too big. Thanks, Lauren C. Cameroon
In recent news, 2/17/10 (actual Japan reporting date), the Japanese have taken matters into their own hands by detaining an anti-whaling activist.
Cote d'Ivoire would like to ask all of you, is this what we call freedom? Can any nation build thier economy over the humane rights we all possess?
We feel that this is one of the issues that hinders us from coming to a solution regarding the issue of whaling. Cote d'Ivoire stresses the improvements in our international community regarding the scarce resources present. So we would like to see more awareness regarding poachers and certain nations selfish laws regarding whaling. It is only as a collaborate force can be fight this problem.
We need more people like the American Cetacean Society to fight for a change. The ACS has compiled a letter with specific solutions encouraging President Obama to find a solution for the commercial whaling issue.
To Lauren, Cameroon: My partner and I are both really excited to discuss the topic at hand. Also, I am glad to discuss our countries policies on these blogs. :)
Serena, Cote d'Ivoire
-------- Link to Anti-whaling detainee: http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2010/s2821820.htm
Link to Letter against whaling: http://www.acsonline.org/issues/whaling/Ltr0901WhalesNeedUs.html
Due to the fact that many countries are first off in a state where they can not reach sustainablity, it comes to the attention of the United Kingdom that we must tackle this issue first. There are many factors that can be taken into account so that countries can reach sustainability and its up to the international community to do so. Therfore the United Kingdom feels that Sustainable development of Emerging Economies must be taken into acound first.
Belgium recognizes that Cote d’Ivoire has brought up an important issue. As a country who does not partake in whale slaughtering, we support the notion of anti-whaling countries working in unison to achieve a common goal, which is to protect whales from becoming victims of over-fishing. In addition, a New Zealand activist by the name of Peter Bethune was detained by Japanese sailors on the Shonan Maru 2 vessel. Bethune is a member of the Sea Shepherd anti-whaling group, who illegally boarded the Japanese vessel in an attempt to arrest the ship’s captain, Hiroyuki Komiya, on the charges of attempted murder. Belgium admires activists’ perseverance and determination to protect whales, yet such clashes between Japanese authorities and activist groups must not continue. Activists are over-stepping their boundaries and breaking laws. In the process they are endangering lives and destroying ships. Belgium notices that an international law is imperative to maintain the peace on international waters. Belgium is aware that the minke whales hunted by Japan are not endangered, but why must we wait until they become endangered. In Europe there is a specific hunting season where fishermen are permitted to pursue their desired prey. Belgium proposes that such a practice be incorporated into the international community, and therefore allow whales and humans to coexist.
However, in regards towards the United Kingdom’s recent post, we would like to second your motion. Belgium believes once the general criteria has been met and established, then we can move on forth to fixing the more detailed problems, such as the whaling conflicts. As a result, a foundation will be established within each country, enabling them to provide themselves with necessities. Therefore, with this in hand, all nations can collaborate with one another to collectively work to tackle the specific issues.
My name is Mackenzie Austin and my partner's name is Charlie Hoffman. We will be representing the delegation of France and we are extremely excited to be debating within this committee come March.
First and foremost, France would like to agree with the delegations before her that the topic of Sustainable Development within Emerging Economies should take precedent over Global Whaling Rights. We believe that there is a plethora of possible ideas and angles to be debated and we believe that this topic would provide a much more varied and diverse discussion. We think that the topic of Sustainable Development will also bring about more participation from even the smallest nations, seeing as the future of our environment, society and economy is pertinent to all of the international community.
In response to a previous post by the delegation of Cote d'Ivoire, we would like to fervently agree with the notion that long-term and short-term goals must be set. Sustainability cannot only come in the near future but also for many generations to come.
Thanks to those of you who have posted. I've read some great reasons why each topic should come first in the agenda, so I think you all have a lot to think about before we begin committee on Friday night.
I would like to steer the comments here in a different direction, though. I was wondering what any of you thought about the new technologies that were posted about by our illustrious vice chairs in the UNEP blog. Does anyone have any ideas about how green technology can help improve development? Have any of you looked into other technologies? What do you think the role of private versus public instututions should be in terms of development? What about public-private relationships?
Also, I am very curious to hear about any other general questions or comments you may have for my vice chairs or me. I would also like to know if there is anything else you would like to see posted about on the blog. (And FYI: I will be posting logistical stuff the week before the conference, so focus more on content.)
France would like to agree with our chair, in that solutions and the exploration of ideas can really be started within this blog rather than waiting for committee. We are looking forward to discussing possible alternative green technologies that can be implemented within countries looking to become more sustainable.
Much of France's energy comes from nuclear power. We lead the world with 59 nuclear power plants and we truly believe that nuclear power is the future for alternative energy sources. Though our country is adamant in the research of this sector, we understand that many nations do not have the means to support such a program. Therefore we would like to propose that countries use green technologies that suit their environment. Hydropower for those near water sources; Solar energy for those with unfertile lands; Wind turbines for those with abundant sources of wind. We believe that countries should have choices when choosing how to "go green" and we believe that using sources that suit your environment really embodies this policy.
More specifically we have looked into Concentrated Solar Power. This technology utiizes mirrors to create heat, and then using the heat to raise steam and drive turbines and generators, similar to coal-fired power plants. It is extremely cost-efficient as well as being able to take advantage of areas plagued by desertification, or the inability to harvest agricultural products. We have also looked into a technology called Batch Oxidation System Gasification or BOS Gasification for short. This system essentially turns waste into combustible gas by thermal air gasification.
France's main goal in green technology really is achieving cost-efficiency, while still attempting to be as eco-friendly as possible. We recognize that many nations are unable to support major green energy programs so France wishes to offer choices for these struggling nations, without having to break the bank. France really wants to stress that as emerging economies prosper, that, as an international community, we cannot force these nations into a more sustainable type of development, therefore putting their economy at risk due to extra costs. We really have to keep this in mind as we attempt to sustainably build, because our main goal should be to raise these economies in the most sustainable way possible, without putting the fragile balance of an emerging economy out of proportion.
France also just wants to ask whether, through the topic of Sustainable Development of Emerging Economies, if as a committee we wish to address all aspects i.e. social, environmental and economic, or just those of the environmental sector? We'd appreciate it if everyone, including the chair, would answer, just so we can get a good feel for how committee will progress.
Cote d'Ivoire Hey france! So pretaining to your question about if as a committe we wish to address all aspects of sustainable development. Cote d'Ivoire feels that in many cases it is necessary in combating emerging economies that we focus on main issues like the environment and the economony. In fact Cote d'Ivoire feels strongly about focusing on main issues such as the enviornment and economy. Also Cote d'Ivoire would like to ask nations how they feel about the use of NGO's?
It's really good to know that you also want to focus on all aspects of sustainable development. France feels like most of the time, only the environmental sector is addressed but is really happy to hear that we wish to broaden our scope, seeing as all of the aspects are truly important.
In terms of your question, France really advocates the use of NGO's. These organizations can be really vital in the implementation of whatever solutions we may propose. We believe that their goals are sound and admirable and we think that if we use NGO's that we can really create lasting resolutions. They ensure the longevity of resolutions and that's what we really want when trying to address these issues.
First off, we would like to thank France for their very well stated ideas as well as their willingness to help take part by supply available help. Speaking from a small nations point of view, green technology is not valued as much by our nations because we feel that there is not point. We have a hard time trying to catch up to developed nations, let alone thining what our economical actions will do to the environment. But that is another direction regarding Globalization.
Well examining the current economic problems, Cote D'Ivoire agrees that having these new forms of green technology will be beneficial to the economy. For example, during the 2008 Beijing Olympics the Chines government regulated the uses of only clean air buses as well as other forms of transporttion. This might first appear to be only an environmental solution, but it did however create massive jobs thus aiding to the country's economy. We understand that not all nations have the ability to start a project of such measure, this new green revolution will definitely be successful.
The shift from regular jobs such as engineering has grown to incorporate "green jobs." UNEP has stated in 2008 that by 2030 green jobs can grow as much as 12 million people. It has also predicted the world to shift from oil to natural gas to wind, solar, and geothermal power. This is a great step up, Cote d'Ivoire encourages these ideas and we are willing to contribute to these efforts by changing our ways of energy, but we are asking the help of developed nations of course.
_____ Jobs http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/sci/tech/7634792.stm
Cote d'Ivoire nailed it. While green development should be differentiated from sustainable development, it is important to note that as part of UNEP, environmental policies should be a priority. Sweden is impressed and even moved by Cote d'Ivoire's willingness to adopt green technology. Sweden seeks to contribute green technology to all countries - especially with SymbioCity, an amalgation of 700 Swedish companies with a singular goal of introducing sustainable development through green technology in cities.
On a side note, we're VERY excited for BMUN - we hope to have lots of fun! Everyone seems so smart and even energized for UNEP... hope to see everyone there!
France completely agrees with the comments made by both Sweden and Cote d'Ivoire above in that green technology cannot only create a cleaner environment, but also create jobs for those in developing nations.
We acknowledge Sweden's ambitions to apply green technology to all nations around the world, yet we must remember that the topic is Sustainable Development in Emerging Economies. These countries that we wish to implement green technology in have fragile economies. We cannot expect these nations to put what little money they do have towards a cleaner type of development, when they are just trying to catch up with the rest of the world's economic system in the first place. (If they have the choice between expensive green technology and cheaper polluting technology, the cheaper one will always win) If we look at when the United States was first going through the industrial revolution, no one was trying to impose cleaner energy technologies on to the country (we realize that these technologies weren't developed yet, but it still provides a good example) If these technologies had been imposed on this country their development would have slowed drastically and maybe even have crippled under the costs that they needed to meet. We have to remember that these economies have to become sustainable in a gradual process, and France believes that resolutions with a benchmark program of sorts would really be long-lasting.
France proposes a sliding scale system in which a country can impose greener technologies in accordance to its GDP. When a country's GDP goes up, they would be encouraged to improve their green technologies, and vise versa. This program would ensure the development of sustainable development while also protecting the economy from failing due to the extra costs that come from implementing green technology.
China commends all nations that have expressed their vehement dedication to assuring that countries are implementing sustainable energy. Like many nations, China has an emerging economy, however we have been a leading force in currently updating towards green and environmentally safe energy. We have the world's largest percentage of hydroelectric generators and have recently been focusing on wind and solar energy.We have incorporated investment and renewals in our economic stimulus strategy, and we have been working closely with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change by implementing approximately 70 Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects.
We would like to serve as a role model in the international community; the People's Republic of China is more than willing to aid nations in developing and executing their own sustainable energy projects. The majority of our solutions are very applicable and adaptable to nations that would like to collaborate with us, such as environmentally sustainable infrastructure (The Chinese Construction Plan) and a string focus on implementing the Millennium Development Goals.
As for whaling, the People's Republic of China remains steadfast on an enforced ban. We would like to see the committee focus on the prevention of the extinction of whales, seeing as this is a rapidly increasing issue facing our world today. Several nations located near our nation have been hunting and killing whales along our coast, which is why we are so adamant on an international ban. We have a strict regulation, which is enforced by confiscating the catch, fishing gear and related income and imposing a fine; detaining or revoking the fishermen's license; and bringing to account by administrative means the chief executives of the entities owning the vessels. China has signed onto a memorandum of understanding on joint enforcement of the UN driftnet resolution with the United States, allowing both nations the right to inspect each other's commercial fishing vessels. We would like to bring this onto an international level, and have all nations sign onto this memorandum.
China, first and foremost, would like to see a strictly regulated international whaling ban. We realize, however, that this is a long term goal, and short term solutions must be implemented in order to form and then strengthen the ban. Two of our many solutions include collaborative research and respect to other nation's coastal boundaries. The People's Republic of China firmly believes that our solutions will ultimately result in an enforceable and binding ban of whaling.
Overall, we are greatly looking forward to stimulating debate and diplomatic collaborations with other delegates. Thank you!
Malaysia would like to commend the previous comments on greatly addressing the concerns of global whaling rights and sustainable development. Much focus has been paid, sustainable development in particular here, to the preservation of the environment. Malaysia greatly looks forward to more discussions on alternate ways to develop economically without damaging the environment. Though, one concept of sustainable development has been left out of the light. The issues of economical development and environmental protection are of significant importance, the social factor is still an important part of the three pillars of sustainable development.
Malaysia would simply like to express the social pillar that addresses issues such as illiteracy and especially poverty in emerging economies. One may also need to take note of the social consequences of emerging economies. Looking back at the Industrial Revolutions of the United States and Great Britain, unregulatd child labor was prevalent, slum-like conditions rampant, and labor wages pitifully low. Such atrocities mar the enormous efforts of us as nations that have been committed to making a better world for all.
Essentially, the explosion in economic growth in these emerging, and even developing, nations have brought on much wealth. Unfortunately, the inequality of consumption is extremely appalling in that the poorest 10% of the world consume only 0.5% of the world's private share of consumption, as compared to the riches 10%, who consumes nearly 59% of all consumption. A failure in this wealth to trickle down to the poor has created an ever widening gap between rich and poor. Take for example the nation of Brazil. It has been deemed as an 'emerging economy' as part of the BRIC group. Yet, according to The World Factbook as of 2005, 26% of the nearly 200 millions inhabitants remain below the poverty line.
Malaysia would again like to stress that although aspirations for economical development without environment degradation is admirable, the cost to humanity is unacceptable. Social issues must be addressed similutaneously as well as environmental. Malaysia, with great intent, is eager to participate in the committee and hopes that all aspects of sustainable development may be addressed.
France would like to recognize Malaysia for bringing about a good point in the fact that the social sector of the topic must be addressed seeing that emerging economies have the highest rates of child labor, human rights violations in the workforce etc.
France has been a leader in the liberalization of the workforce and that is mainly because we see compromise. First of all we recognize that the complete eradication of child labor is quite unfeasible. Though this is an ideal goal and we urge many nations to adopt this policy, we have to realize that there is a difference between voluntary and forced child labor.
On a related note, France would like to encourage many nations to adopt a piece of legislation called the Labor Contract Law. Though western nations see the issue of contracts within the workforce a staple to our culture, many developing nations do not require their businesses to issue them. The implementation of this law would allow for prosecution against human rights violations in the workforce and mediate the scope of the work.
Liechtenstein notes previous countries direction towards energy, but thinks that targeting economy and the workforce are two areas that are predominantly important. Especially in Third World countries where electricity is scarce, the burden of switching to a sustainable energy would prove impossible. Liechtenstein believes that education and elimination of corruption are necessary in improving the economy, and the education will aid the workforce with knowledgeable employees.
As the country with the highest GDP per capita, and relatively low natural resources, Lichtenstein is willing to provide ideas to help upcoming countries embody their own. Liechtenstein's business centered economy has proved profitable and we look forward to improving other economies as well.
Although Liechtenstein does arise a good point about the use of energy and the economy,the main aspects of these possible solutions are more geared towards long terms goals. Cote d'Ivoire is not suggesting that long term goals should be suggested, due to the fact that long term goals are improtant but feels that proper action should be taken now.
This is why Cote d'Ivoire feels that by proposing proper solutions geared more towards the enviornment, it can not only improve sustainability but set and overall foundation for long term goals. We truly need to focus on the short term action first before we dig are hands into the heavy long term goals.
The Kingdom of Belgium would like to begin by addressing the delegations of France and The People’s Republic of China. France, we would like to commend your post considering how you brought up various key points along with certain solutions to go with. Belgium would simply ask if you could verify and further elaborate your proposed “Sliding-Scale System” and explain how this could aid not only the developed, but most importantly the developing countries.
China, we were very interested when you claimed your country began to install 70 Clean Development Mechanism projects. How do these projects intend to efficiently reduce the harm caused to the environment? Do you as a country believe that this procedure will help make your country become more environmentally friendly? Although China has reduced its coal emissions and boasts a population of 1.3 billion inhabitants, it still remains first on the list of the world’s largest polluters. Furthermore, the Chinese government has yet to associate with the Copenhagen Accord.
Malaysia, the Kingdom of Belgium clearly understands the importance of the side effects, such as child labor, that can be created as a result of countries attempting to keep stride with the powerful developed nations, and their already productive economies. However, this committee is called the United Nations Environmental Program, and the issue you have brought at hand is a humanitarian crisis, therefore it is not our committee’s responsibility to handle this situation. This problem is to be left in the hands of the 3rd Committee: Social, Cultural, and Humanitarian. We must not stray from our own problem, which is the sustainable development of emerging economies. The Kingdom of Belgium believes that Lichtenstein’s proposal to incorporate the economic structure of successful countries into developing nations will not only benefit the developing country to have an economic foundation to expand on, but it will also provide more commercial markets for the already developed nations.
Delegates, this situation has become dire, and in these past blogs, we have spent more than enough time dwelling upon the past. Many people brought the Industrial revolution as an example, however times are different now. “Green technology” and the issue on environmental degradation is a topic of the twentieth century. The past is past, and there is no action that can be taken to rearrange history. Current developing nations cannot take the path the United States took during the Industrial Revolution to currently become the economic powerhouse of the global community, that path is no longer feasible. That is why Belgium sees the only way to success is by moving forward and having all the countries begin to discuss newer methods to help all the developing countries reach economic and environmental stability. To begin with, South American countries such as Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador and Peru, have introduced solar power into their everyday lives, reducing the dependency on coal and wood. By using these solar powers, the South American countries will reduce their air pollution by no longer burning fuel and also saving money by not buying batteries. The saved money can then be distributed to schools and hospitals. Sometimes it could be as easy and simple as installing solar panels, and we the developed nations can speed up this process if we all are willing to donate funds to these countries in need. These developing countries have become dependent on us to help them by providing the money and support in order to commence these programs. Without our aid, these countries will remain weak and powerless, but with our helping hand, they will all strive towards a better standard of living that does not result in the pollution of the environment. Belgium sees that ideas like the one provided above will help drastically change lives across these developing countries and help them take a major step towards the ultimate goal, which is a sustainable, environmental-friendly economy.
The People's Republic of China would like to expand upon our CDM's and bring to the committee's attention that we have recently signed onto the Copenhagen Accord.
China has installed 70 Clean Development Mechanisms, and we fully believe that these are contributing to the reduction of environmental harm. The projects approved by China are aiding us in lowering our greenhouse gas emissions. The majority of the projects are working towards renewable energy, N20 decomposition, energy saving mechanisms. Since China fully believes that renewable energy is vital to sustainable development, we are implementing hydropower, hydroelectric, and wind power projects.
The reason that China had not signed onto the Copenhagen Accord when it was first introduced was because it was putting too much strain on developing nations that are not emitting high levels of greenhouse gases. We believe that nations who produce the most must have higher responsibility when it comes to reversing the damages of greenhouse gases.
As of February 1, 2010, China has been in full support of and signed the Copenhagen Accord. We have pledged to reduce our carbon dioxide emission intensity per unit of GDP by 40 to 45 percent by 2020 (which is a voluntary goal that China proposed to be added on to the agreement), an increase to 15 percent of non-fossil fuels in our total primary energy mix by 2020, an increase of 40 million hectares of forest and 1.3 billion cubic meters of forest levels, and to work with other nations in order to address the climate change.
China clearly recognizes that we are one of the leaders in pollution and greenhouse gas emissions; however, it is proven evident that we are striving towards lowering these levels with the Copenhagen Accord, as well working towards creating sustainable development for future generations.
The United Kingdom would first off like to state that they once again agree upon the issue of placing Sustainable Development for Emerging Economies as the first topic for discussion. Being a developed country gives the United Kingdom many opportunities to help the international community on the issue of emerging economies. In the past, the United Kingdom has been very successful in proving assistance to countries such as Angola, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Somalia. Also being heavily involved with the European Union gives the United Kingdom more influence on providing the necessities to help countries reach sustainability.
On February 1, 2009, the United Kingdom created the Sustainable Development Commission (SDC) in order place a watchdog committee on the Sustainable Development of not just the United Kingdom but a series of countries also. Under the SDC Report of 2009 it states that, “The United Kingdom shall place progression on monitoring targets on the sustainable management of the Government estate and sustainable procurement.” This would therefore allow the United Kingdom to part in an advisory role for different governments. Already, the United Kingdom has been able to bring the Scottish Government and the Welsh Assembly Government closer together in enabling a more efficient role in government.
Within this committee the United Kingdom has seen many great points that have been brought up by many delegations and the chair as well, and would like to address the main concerns. In response to France’s inquiry on what aspects to address within committee, the United Kingdom feels that all social, economical, and environmental factors of sustainable development must be regarded with moreover a stress on the environmental sector. The United Kingdom agrees on the use of alternative energy mainly green technology, but would like to point out that there still remains the question of how to impose such technology for countries that rely on their resources such as oil and kerosene as their main source of energy.
For this reason, the United Kingdom believes that the best option that can be proposed on the issue of alternative energy is actually providing an incentive upon legislature which can be administered throughout the international community. Because the United Kingdom has recently provided funding towards Lebanon’s solar units, the United Kingdom believes that incentives would be the best option for many countries. Furthermore, the United Kingdom looks towards furthering on this issue within committee and, in addition, having a wider debate on the issue of alternative energy.
Next, the United Kingdom would like to bring up a previous statement by Cote D'ivoire in applying long term goals. The United Kingdom feels that this is vital since in reality sustainability takes years to achieve, and therefore long term goals can help benefit a country in the long run. But, the United Kingdom would like to note that short term solutions must still be taken strongly into account on the issue of sustainable development. This is why the United Kingdom has found efficiency in running fact- finding missions regarding the issue of gaining knowledge on a country’s sustainability. This has also allowed more nations to understand the situations that are occurring within countries which are still classified as emerging economies.
Furthermore, the chair previously asked. “What do you think the role of private versus public institutions should be in terms of development? What about public-private relationships?” In response, the United Kingdom believes that it is vital to invest in both public and private institutions including multinational corporations. But, in order for a country to be economically stable, privatization must be taken so that the government has a certain amount of control or “administrative guidance” in private institutions as well. In addition, the United Kingdom feels that it’s necessary to establish public- private relations, and that there must be development and co-ordination in establishing Public Private Partners .Within the United Kingdom, we have developed a Strategic Investment Board Limited (SIB) under Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister (OFMDFM) which works towards developing these relations in aiding the infrastructure of Northern Ireland. Therefore the United Kingdom’s feels that developing nations must work towards establishing similar approaches such as these in working with public and private corporations.
Next, the United Kingdom would like to stress a key point brought up by the United Nations Economic and Social Council Resolution on July 28th . It stated that, “effective sustainable development strategies need to pursue an integrated approach to economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainable development, in line with the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, the Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development, the Plan of Implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, and other relevant outcomes of the United Nations conferences and summits.” The United Kingdom strongly affirms this statement and feels that it is necessary to take into account development strategies that have already been recommended through the United Nations in moving forward on developmental programs. Just like the delegation on behalf of Belgium stated, “The only way to success is moving forward.”
Overall, the United Kingdom is very pleased that most countries see that sustainability is important and that this committee is on the right track to helping countries obtain sustainability.
France appreciates that many countries have taken the initiative and discussed that we must work towards a more sustainable world, though we wish to discuss more of the "how we want to achieve this status" rather than "what status we wish to achieve". France believes that there are many more solutions, long-term and short-term, that can deal with the social and economic sustainability of our earth, on top of alternative energy sources. We believe that many nations have provided valuable solutions, though France thinks we can broaden our horizons.
On the topic of incentives, France would like to emphasize that nations are only going to commit to change if they truly want to. Though incentives can provide a valuable form of getting things done, nations are going to attempt to use the most cost-efficient technology, not the most energy-efficient. France believes that incentives can be effective to a certain point but that the initiative to take that step but be present first in our efforts to create a more sustainable world.
Questions have also been brought up about the era when the United States was industrializing and the analogy made there. France would like to clarify in that we didnt mean for others to construe our message and that we only meant that the time for an emerging economy is not easy and we must be willling to give them some slack. Many nations ahve brought up that they wish to look towards the future rather than the past, though France disagrees. Looking towards history can aid us in correcting our mistakes and we believe that a failure to do so can be quite detrimental to our aims as a body.
France would like to commend China and we hope that many other nations follow suit, though we ask if and how these extra costs have curbed your economic development? France would like to stress again that we must gradually implement these solutions into emerging economies, but this must not hinder our transition from an inadequate form of development to a more sufficient one. Our economy is every bit as fragile as the state of our environment, but the cost of not doing anything could be even higher than the cost of implementing a few changes to our way of doing things.
The delegation of Australia would like to commend the United Kingdom for their attention to the need of implementing short term solutions for sustainable development to be recognized just as much as long term ones. In 1992, the transition to a more sustainable nation was officially enacted within Australia through the creation of the National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development. The NSESD focuses on the use and enhancement of resources within every community in order to implement more sustainable and improved life styles. This organization has both long and short-term goals in mind and most importantly, includes the citizens of Australia to take part in preservation and improvement. By educating the citizens on the importance of their community and how progress is dependent on the ecosystem rather than the economy, it gives them an enhanced connection to the importance of their community for present and future generations to come. This allows both urban and rural citizens to partake in creating a more sustainable environment through utilizing and preserving the resources which they are familiar. Therefore, by involving members of communities, a more informed and concerned population may develop leading to immediate as well as long-term effective sustainable progress.
Also regarding the United Kingdom’s/ the chair’s inquiry regarding the relationship between public and private institutions, the delegation of Australia would like to agree with the United Kingdom on the need to establish public-private collaboration. It is highly important within both developed and developing nations that cooperation occurs, especially regarding the sustainability of countries. Also, commenting on the idea of privatization, Australia has only recently acted in the privatization movement (beginning in the late 1990s). However, privatization within Australia is of considerable magnitude; thus, as the United Kingdom stated, it must be done in order to ensure economic stability.
All in all, the delegation of Australia is excited to discuss further on both issues and is looking forward to seeing all of you in a few days.
Delegates, the nation of Cote d'Ivoire has been reading the blogs and have noticed that many nations have been blogging about on sustainable development in emerging economies.
However, there has been a recent article about whaling all over the news. For instance the nation of Australia, do you realize that your nation has clearly been attacking the nation of Japan on its whaling conflicts. Although Cote d'Ivoire does understand that sustainable development in emerging economies is important, it feels that the topic on whaling rights has been underlooked in this blog spot.
For whaling is most likely occuring right now at this very moment. The Labour's Foreign Affairs Spokesperson, Chris Carter is urging the Government to get behind an Australian proposal to finally phase out whaling. In many cases this has sparked intrest on holding a special meeting of the International Whaling Commission in Florida soon.
On the other hand, whaling nations want to restart commercial hunting of many of these endangered mammals, especially whales. The IWC is said to only have two main solid options on the table in handling this major issue. To elobrate further on the nations of Australia, which since they have not posted anything about there recent actions, there overall position on stoping whaling and attacking whaling is backed by many respected NGOs, one major one including the World Society for the Protection of Animals.
Japan really does need to end its whaling. Many nations have stated, one major one being Australia, that if the nation of Japan does not voluntarily end its whaling programme by November of this year, then nations will take this case to the International Court of Justice.
Cote d'Ivoire feels that many nations in the blog need to seriously think abuot what one nation might do about this proposal against Japan. So the true question to nations is, should whaling truly be allowed anymore?
In response to Cote d'Ivoire's post, the United States would like to make our stance on whaling known. The United States believes that all whaling should ease; however, many countries believe that whaling is an essential part of their economy so the termination of whaling would be impossible. The best that we can do is to let up on whaling enough so that the populations are given enough time to rebuild themselves. The United States recommends that quotas for whale hunting should be lowered annually so the whale population would not decrease as rapidly. Furthermore, we further suggest that whale hunting should be only allowed in certain areas in certain times of the year, so it will prevent over-hunting of one species. In addition, cetacean research centers should be monitored periodically to review researching techniques so that they are humane and involve the least amount of harm to the organisms being studied. Not only are these solutions easily implemented, by they would prove to be effective and beneficial to the world as a whole.
Cambodia would first like to apologize for not contributing to this debate earlier.
Cambodia is shocked at the international community for discussing ideas such as green technology and the implementation of renewable energy sources. Cambodia realizes that the countries that have discussed these things all have good intentions, but when people in rural areas of many countries are losing their livelihoods and do not have access to clean water because of physical environmental degradation, Cambodia cannot sit by and listen to larger countries talk about the different things they want to implement. If countries such as Cambodia are to strengthen their environments and be able to sustain economic growth simultaneously, doesn’t it make sense that the first step we should take is to allow our people access to a clean glass of water every now and then? Green technology for small countries that do not have large populations and do not emit very many emissions is a waste of time and money. If we could reduce the emissions that the larger countries emit by only a small percentage, we would essentially be making an entire smaller country go green. What should be really important to smaller rural nations such as Cambodia are the opportunities that we can give to our people so that they have a chance to strengthen the environment, the economy, and the country at the same time.
And, why has no one spoken about the pressing issue of deforestation?
In Brazil, if the deforestation that was present in the Amazon rainforest were to be stopped, one can only imagine the environmental benefits that would follow. Obviously, Cambodia does not believe that this is a feasible situation in the short term; there will always be at least a small amount of deforestation present on this earth. But why spend time talking about complex green technologies and nuclear reactors when one of the things that we can do in the short term is to prevent illegal logging activities?
We want to work with every nation. But to do that, we have to prioritize. Cambodia realizes that the priorities and goals of larger nations are different from our own. We are entirely ready to accept this fact. Therefore, we propose that larger countries focus on bigger projects that will cut down on emissions and in the long run greatly reduce the effects of global warming. One of the things that larger countries can do is to implement technologies such as nuclear reactors and hydroelectric power where they are applicable. The other technologies stated by other countries and by the chairs also seem like good methods that large countries can take to save their environments.
On the other hand, Cambodia and underdeveloped nations need to do things entirely differently. Even with the help of multiple nations, many energy efficiency programs simply cannot be implemented without a large surplus of money and resources, two things which the world seems to be constantly in demand of. Cambodia will promote programs that will aid in simpler tasks that will jump start slow economies. One of these things is to cut off negative externalities. An example of this is to fund projects such as the enforcement of environmental protection legislation and to create environmental preservation projects. Doing this would passively increase the strength of the environmental and also bolster the earth’s natural defense against global warming. These methods that smaller countries can take are very cost efficient even on a large scale and is the best step that small underdeveloped nations such as Cambodia can take to attack the issue of sustainable development from an environmental perspective.
In response to Cote d'Ivoire's post of February 25th, Liechtenstein would like to ask whether or not environmental changes are short or long term goals. Seeing that the resources needed to bring on great environmental change are lacking and the great measures that need to be taking, Liechtenstein understands that environmental reformation is truly a long term goal.
This being said, Liechtenstein would like to agree with Cote d'Ivoire in that environmental changes are truly a necessity in developing a sustainable economy. In addition, Liechtenstein would like to reiterate the necessity to attack corruption and improve the education that those in developing nations are receiving. Together these propositions, along with environmental reformation will lead to the development of sustainable economies.
Turning to the issue of whaling, Liechtenstein would also like to agree with the United States' previous post but also notes that many of these propositions have previously been instituted and have not been as effective as the United States calls for. However, Liechtenstein does believe that a monitoring of scientific research of whaling (especially in Japan) is truly a necessity in overcoming this issue.
In addition to what Cote d'Ivoire has stated regarding the Australian front against Japan, Liechtenstein would also like to notify all of the delegates that as of today, it has been made known that Japan hopes to reinstitute commercial whaling at the IWC congregation that begins this Tuesday. Liechtenstein would like to strongly reiterate the necessity to prevent this revival. In order to prevent further and unnecessary whaling, the IWC as well as all of the countries of the delegation must find a balance point upon which Japan can continue whaling, slowly weening away from it as the years go by, and eventually reach a point where no more whaling can occur. This goes for all other countries who hope to continue whaling for the time being.
All in all, Liechtenstein wold like to reiterate that the necessity to stop whaling is there, but the manner in which we do so must include extreme caution in order to avert any unnecessary hostilities.
The delegation on behalf of the United Kingdom would like to thank Cote d'Ivoire for its mention that the topic of Global Whaling Rights has been under looked in this blog. Even though we wish to place Sustainable Development of Emerging Economies first on the agenda, we still view Global Whaling Rights as a very important topic in need of strong recognition.
The United Kingdom for the past fifty years has opposed any sort of whaling. As one of the signatories of the Memorandum of Understanding, the United Kingdom has strongly supported the action plans provided in this document taken towards aiding the numbers of whale species between the waters between Morocco and South Africa. In addition, the United Kingdom has played a leading role in International Whaling Commission (IWC) negotiations and wishes to maintain the international moratorium on commercial whaling. In tackling this issue, however, the United Kingdom feels that harsher measures must be imposed if a nation is to allegedly violate the International Whaling Commission moratorium and any international law that has been placed on whaling.
In 2008, the World Wildlife Fund stated, “We continue to oppose commercial whaling—now and until whale stocks have fully recovered, and the governments of the world have brought whaling fully under international control with a precautionary and conservation-based enforceable management and compliance system in all whaling nations.” The United Kingdom strongly adheres to this statement and therfore feels that it is absolutely vital to enforce management and restriction amongst whaling nations.
The delegation on behalf of Liechtenstein stated that, “As of today, it has been made known that Japan hopes to reinstitute commercial whaling at the IWC congregation that begins this Tuesday.” The United Kingdom has for the past two decades acknowledged Japan’s willingness in committing to commercial whaling, seeing as there have even been claims of whaling solely for “research purposes”. The United Kingdom would like to note that any reinstitution of commercial whaling would require the removal of the current moratorium, and all efforts taken towards this removal, such as the previously proposed Revised Management Scheme (RMS), have failed. The United Kingdom would then like to reiterate that this moratorium is vital in order to both sustain and increase the currently diminished whale population, and if any nation is to discuss the removal of the moratorium they must take into account the RMS which began in 1994 under the IWC and still is ongoing, yet little of any at all progress has been achieved.
In the article titled “Notes on Whaling” the chair stated, “In fact research using genetics and anecdotal reports some point global whale populations may have been around 1.5 million instead of the original 100,000 estimated by the International Whaling Committee. More specifically, researchers estimate that the whale population of New Zealand, a country known for excessive whaling, originally had over 25,000 whales but has been reduced to having a mere 25 reproducing females.” This statement brings much concern and dismay to the United Kingdom. All whales are protected by the law in the United Kingdom’s waters and have been ever since the 1970’s when the United Kingdom banned the increasingly unprofitable whaling and trading of whale products. Statements such as these should only give the international community more initiative to halt any form of whaling, impose harsher measures within their own nation in order to combat whaling, and work towards the establishment of further whaling research efforts.
The delegation on behalf of the United Kingdom would like to thank Cote d'Ivoire for its mention that the topic of Global Whaling Rights has been under looked in this blog. Even though we wish to place Sustainable Development of Emerging Economies first on the agenda, we still view Global Whaling Rights as a very important topic in need of strong recognition.
The United Kingdom for the past fifty years has opposed any sort of whaling. As one of the signatories of the Memorandum of Understanding, the United Kingdom has strongly supported the action plans provided in this document taken towards aiding the numbers of whale species between the waters between Morocco and South Africa. In addition, the United Kingdom has played a leading role in International Whaling Commission (IWC) negotiations and wishes to maintain the international moratorium on commercial whaling. In tackling this issue, however, the United Kingdom feels that harsher measures must be imposed if a nation is to allegedly violate the International Whaling Commission moratorium and any international law that has been placed on whaling.
In 2008, the World Wildlife Fund stated, “We continue to oppose commercial whaling—now and until whale stocks have fully recovered, and the governments of the world have brought whaling fully under international control with a precautionary and conservation-based enforceable management and compliance system in all whaling nations.” The United Kingdom strongly adheres to this statement and therfore feels that it is absolutely vital to enforce management and restriction amongst whaling nations.
The delegation on behalf of Liechtenstein stated that, “As of today, it has been made known that Japan hopes to reinstitute commercial whaling at the IWC congregation that begins this Tuesday.” The United Kingdom has for the past two decades acknowledged Japan’s willingness in committing to commercial whaling, seeing as there have even been claims of whaling solely for “research purposes”. The United Kingdom would like to note that any reinstitution of commercial whaling would require the removal of the current moratorium, and all efforts taken towards this removal, such as the previously proposed Revised Management Scheme (RMS), have failed. The United Kingdom would then like to reiterate that this moratorium is vital in order to both sustain and increase the currently diminished whale population, and if any nation is to discuss the removal of the moratorium they must take into account the RMS which began in 1994 under the IWC and still is ongoing, yet little of any at all progress has been achieved.
In the article titled “Notes on Whaling” the chair stated, “In fact research using genetics and anecdotal reports some point global whale populations may have been around 1.5 million instead of the original 100,000 estimated by the International Whaling Committee. More specifically, researchers estimate that the whale population of New Zealand, a country known for excessive whaling, originally had over 25,000 whales but has been reduced to having a mere 25 reproducing females.” This statement brings much concern and dismay to the United Kingdom. All whales are protected by the law in the United Kingdom’s waters and have been ever since the 1970’s when the United Kingdom banned the increasingly unprofitable whaling and trading of whale products. Statements such as these should only give the international community more initiative to halt any form of whaling, impose harsher measures within their own nation in order to combat whaling, and work towards the establishment of further whaling research efforts.
France would like to respond to a previous post made by Liechtenstein, when they had asked whether our environmental goals woud be long-term or short-term goals, but France would like to ask, Why not both? The issue of our environment in accordance with sustainable development not only must happen in the near future, but for many generations to come as well.
In terms of a previous post made by Cambodia, France would like to be the first to apologize if the blogs earlier didn't truly address the needs of nations like itself and if we offended you by providing alternative energy sources. Though France would like to reiterate that the topic being discussed is Sustainable Development in Emerging Economies, not completely-underdeveloped nations. These natons are on their way towards a more industrialized lifestyle and therefore have already dealt with the many problems that Cambodia brought up earlier. Though Cambodia has made valid points, we have to remember which nations we are dealing with and that for these countries, carbon emissions are at an all time high. In order to solve this issue, France believes that the implementation of alternative energy sources is essential in our attempts to create a more sustainable world.
In terms of Global Whaling Rights, France believes that the 1946 Washington Convention, that was orginally meant to deal with the issues of whaling for scientific research, do not truly reflect the issues that effect us in the 21st century today. It was not intended to be able to sustain the amount of technology that we, as an international community, possess today. Whaling quotas are not controlled by the treaty, but rather the countries themselves. It allows the killing of whales, even though recent studies have proved that tests may be done on those that are live. France believes, that since this is one of the leading documents on scientific whaling, that the stipulations in this agreement must be brought up to date.
Regarding sustainable development, India believes that much attention should be given to long-term goals, supported by both short-term and long-term projects. While many sustainable development efforts may require a long period of time, there are positive changes that we can make almost immediately.
In addition, India would like to stress the importance of historical and differentiated responsibilities. Countries that industrialized long ago did so through methods that contributed greatly to the climate change we must presently face. Such countries carry great responsibility in addressing this issue. However, global climate change is a shared challenge for all members of the international community. Steps taken by one country to harness alternative energy or develop sustainably result in benefits that are not confined within a border.
Emerging economies like India are largely focused on addressing poverty and spurring economic growth. Few resources, then, are left to invest in green technology and alternative energy. Yet, such countries are largely affected by environmental degradation and climate change.
India believes in the importance of industrialized countries promoting sustainable development in emerging economies by providing access to green technology and monetary support.
Sustainable development is key to addressing the issue of global climate change. And steps any emerging economy makes to develop sustainably will benefit all members of the international community in the long-run.
I am so happy to hear from such a diverse group of nations with such a wide range of opinions. Thank you all for responding to this blog, and for continuing to think thoughtfully about the issues at hand.
One thing I would like to address, however, is the discussion on which topic you wish to debate first. Without saying too much, I am going to highly encourage you all to stray from this discussion a bit and focus on more substantive comments in this forum. I am glad to learn that you are all excited for debate, but in true BMUN tradition, there may be some outside forces in the works which might inspire the way that the agenda will be set. So, if from here on out, I would encourage you to focus your comments on addressing points brought up either by the chairs in the blog, or by your fellow delegates in this forum.
And thanks for the high quality research papers. We're looking forward to hearing from you all this weekend.
It has been mentioned by multiple delegates that Australia has adopted a strong stance against Japanese whaling and plans to take proactive measures to prevent it. However, Kuwait hopes that this committee does not turn a blind eye to the fact that Australia is facilitating Japanese whaling by permitting Japanese whalers to charter Australian planes, on Australian territory and over Australian seas, in order to monitor anti-whaling activists, such as Greenpeace, and avoid them.
Congrats on BMUN 58! You all did a fantastic job this week-end and I sincerely meant everything I said about you being the BEST COMMITTEE of my BMUN experience ever. I hope you all return to BMUN 59 and perhaps that any of you graduating seniors consider coming to Cal.
If you have not received your position papers and/or grading rubrics, please let me know and I'll get back to you ASAP.
Hi, My name is Lauren and I'm a delegate from St. Francis High School. My country is Cameroon, and though I know that it's pro-whaling, I'm having a hard time figuring out much else. Cameroon gives no reasoning for its position, and I've tried looking up the other countries with similar circumstances in the IWC (Gambia and Togo) and still can't find anything. Any advice?
ReplyDeleteThanks so much,
Lauren C.
Also, I just wanted to say how excited I am for BMUN. I honestly look forward to BMUN for the majority of the year, and it feels like these last months in MUN have just flown by. Anyways,
ReplyDeleteThanks
Lauren C.
Hey Lauren,
ReplyDeleteGlad to hear you are excited for BMUN, we are all working hard to make sure this year is amazing for the delegates, and we look forward to seeing all the new faces.
Now on to your question. To be honest many people believe that poorer countries such as Cameroon with no direct reason to have an opinion in favor of whaling are being paid off by pro-whaling countries to side with them. This has not been completely confirmed, but it is a reasonable suspicion.
That being said, there is clearly no way for you to bring this point up as a legitimate argument in favor of whaling in the BMUN debates. Instead, I would focus on a more general pro-whaling argument, such as believing countries have the right to utilize their own resources as they see fit.
Good luck with your paper, and let me know if you have any more questions.
My partner and I are impatient for this year’s debate, considering the importance of both topics at hand. Thus leading us to propose the question as to which topic we should discuss first. On a personal note, Belgium believes that we should start our committee’s discussion with the Sustainable Development of Emerging Economies. Belgium sees it’s only fitting that with the recent United Nations Climate Change Conference held in Copenhagen, Denmark there is currently ample room to discuss numerous solutions that could ultimately solve the issue at hand.
ReplyDeleteIn reference to Cameroon’s concerns, Belgium believes that every country is entitled to their own opinion, in contrast to their geographic positioning. Both topics are addressing a global issue, and therefore, they must be considered by all nations, whether you are pro-whaling or not. Even though your country has had limited involvement with this issue, you can still propose solutions that will benefit all members of the United Nations.
Thank you, we are eager to hear your suggestions and thoughts,
Kingdom of Belgium
Hi everyone and Chairs,
ReplyDeleteMy name is Serena Chu and my partner is Larissa Lacoix, we will be representing the nation of Cote d'ivoire. We are boh really excited to attend the conference!
Well we just wanted to give a shout out to the people in our committee as well as the chairs.
And just to start off a conversation with fellow delegates, Cote D'ivoire is stressing the importance for long term goals; not that short term and quick relief isnt important.
So what do you guys think?
Serena -Cote D'ivoire
Thank you so much Hewa and Belgium! I really think that we should start with Whaling, but that's just because it's my topic. Serena, I'd love to comment and I completely agree, but to be honest I haven't done my research yet and that's my partner's topic. I'll have to get her to start blogging also. Does anyone have any tips for giving speeches? I'm horrible with public speaking but I'd love to improve. Also, is anyone familiar with North Gate Hall? I had committee there last year and it was such a pretty building, and I'm hoping that we'll miraculously have committee there this year too, even though UNEP is probably too big.
ReplyDeleteThanks,
Lauren C.
Cameroon
In recent news, 2/17/10 (actual Japan reporting date), the Japanese have taken matters into their own hands by detaining an anti-whaling activist.
ReplyDeleteCote d'Ivoire would like to ask all of you, is this what we call freedom? Can any nation build thier economy over the humane rights we all possess?
We feel that this is one of the issues that hinders us from coming to a solution regarding the issue of whaling. Cote d'Ivoire stresses the improvements in our international community regarding the scarce resources present. So we would like to see more awareness regarding poachers and certain nations selfish laws regarding whaling. It is only as a collaborate force can be fight this problem.
We need more people like the American Cetacean Society to fight for a change. The ACS has compiled a letter with specific solutions encouraging President Obama to find a solution for the commercial whaling issue.
To Lauren, Cameroon:
My partner and I are both really excited to discuss the topic at hand. Also, I am glad to discuss our countries policies on these blogs. :)
Serena, Cote d'Ivoire
--------
Link to Anti-whaling detainee:
http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2010/s2821820.htm
Link to Letter against whaling:
http://www.acsonline.org/issues/whaling/Ltr0901WhalesNeedUs.html
Due to the fact that many countries are first off in a state where they can not reach sustainablity, it comes to the attention of the United Kingdom that we must tackle this issue first. There are many factors that can be taken into account so that countries can reach sustainability and its up to the international community to do so. Therfore the United Kingdom feels that Sustainable development of Emerging Economies must be taken into acound first.
ReplyDeleteBelgium recognizes that Cote d’Ivoire has brought up an important issue. As a country who does not partake in whale slaughtering, we support the notion of anti-whaling countries working in unison to achieve a common goal, which is to protect whales from becoming victims of over-fishing. In addition, a New Zealand activist by the name of Peter Bethune was detained by Japanese sailors on the Shonan Maru 2 vessel. Bethune is a member of the Sea Shepherd anti-whaling group, who illegally boarded the Japanese vessel in an attempt to arrest the ship’s captain, Hiroyuki Komiya, on the charges of attempted murder. Belgium admires activists’ perseverance and determination to protect whales, yet such clashes between Japanese authorities and activist groups must not continue. Activists are over-stepping their boundaries and breaking laws. In the process they are endangering lives and destroying ships. Belgium notices that an international law is imperative to maintain the peace on international waters. Belgium is aware that the minke whales hunted by Japan are not endangered, but why must we wait until they become endangered. In Europe there is a specific hunting season where fishermen are permitted to pursue their desired prey. Belgium proposes that such a practice be incorporated into the international community, and therefore allow whales and humans to coexist.
ReplyDeleteHowever, in regards towards the United Kingdom’s recent post, we would like to second your motion. Belgium believes once the general criteria has been met and established, then we can move on forth to fixing the more detailed problems, such as the whaling conflicts. As a result, a foundation will be established within each country, enabling them to provide themselves with necessities. Therefore, with this in hand, all nations can collaborate with one another to collectively work to tackle the specific issues.
Hello UNEP and Chairs,
ReplyDeleteMy name is Mackenzie Austin and my partner's name is Charlie Hoffman. We will be representing the delegation of France and we are extremely excited to be debating within this committee come March.
First and foremost, France would like to agree with the delegations before her that the topic of Sustainable Development within Emerging Economies should take precedent over Global Whaling Rights. We believe that there is a plethora of possible ideas and angles to be debated and we believe that this topic would provide a much more varied and diverse discussion. We think that the topic of Sustainable Development will also bring about more participation from even the smallest nations, seeing as the future of our environment, society and economy is pertinent to all of the international community.
In response to a previous post by the delegation of Cote d'Ivoire, we would like to fervently agree with the notion that long-term and short-term goals must be set. Sustainability cannot only come in the near future but also for many generations to come.
Mackenzie Austin- France
Hello Delegates!
ReplyDeleteThanks to those of you who have posted. I've read some great reasons why each topic should come first in the agenda, so I think you all have a lot to think about before we begin committee on Friday night.
I would like to steer the comments here in a different direction, though. I was wondering what any of you thought about the new technologies that were posted about by our illustrious vice chairs in the UNEP blog. Does anyone have any ideas about how green technology can help improve development? Have any of you looked into other technologies? What do you think the role of private versus public instututions should be in terms of development? What about public-private relationships?
Also, I am very curious to hear about any other general questions or comments you may have for my vice chairs or me. I would also like to know if there is anything else you would like to see posted about on the blog. (And FYI: I will be posting logistical stuff the week before the conference, so focus more on content.)
Glad to see you all posting away though!
Cheers,
Beth
France would like to agree with our chair, in that solutions and the exploration of ideas can really be started within this blog rather than waiting for committee. We are looking forward to discussing possible alternative green technologies that can be implemented within countries looking to become more sustainable.
ReplyDeleteMuch of France's energy comes from nuclear power. We lead the world with 59 nuclear power plants and we truly believe that nuclear power is the future for alternative energy sources. Though our country is adamant in the research of this sector, we understand that many nations do not have the means to support such a program. Therefore we would like to propose that countries use green technologies that suit their environment. Hydropower for those near water sources; Solar energy for those with unfertile lands; Wind turbines for those with abundant sources of wind. We believe that countries should have choices when choosing how to "go green" and we believe that using sources that suit your environment really embodies this policy.
More specifically we have looked into Concentrated Solar Power. This technology utiizes mirrors to create heat, and then using the heat to raise steam and drive turbines and generators, similar to coal-fired power plants. It is extremely cost-efficient as well as being able to take advantage of areas plagued by desertification, or the inability to harvest agricultural products. We have also looked into a technology called Batch Oxidation System Gasification or BOS Gasification for short. This system essentially turns waste into combustible gas by thermal air gasification.
France's main goal in green technology really is achieving cost-efficiency, while still attempting to be as eco-friendly as possible. We recognize that many nations are unable to support major green energy programs so France wishes to offer choices for these struggling nations, without having to break the bank. France really wants to stress that as emerging economies prosper, that, as an international community, we cannot force these nations into a more sustainable type of development, therefore putting their economy at risk due to extra costs. We really have to keep this in mind as we attempt to sustainably build, because our main goal should be to raise these economies in the most sustainable way possible, without putting the fragile balance of an emerging economy out of proportion.
France also just wants to ask whether, through the topic of Sustainable Development of Emerging Economies, if as a committee we wish to address all aspects i.e. social, environmental and economic, or just those of the environmental sector? We'd appreciate it if everyone, including the chair, would answer, just so we can get a good feel for how committee will progress.
Thank you!
Mackenzie Austin- France
Cote d'Ivoire
ReplyDeleteHey france! So pretaining to your question about if as a committe we wish to address all aspects of sustainable development. Cote d'Ivoire feels that in many cases it is necessary in combating emerging economies that we focus on main issues like the environment and the economony. In fact Cote d'Ivoire feels strongly about focusing on main issues such as the enviornment and economy.
Also Cote d'Ivoire would like to ask nations how they feel about the use of NGO's?
Thanks!
Larissa Lacroix-Cote d'Ivoire
Thanks Cote d'Ivoire
ReplyDeleteIt's really good to know that you also want to focus on all aspects of sustainable development. France feels like most of the time, only the environmental sector is addressed but is really happy to hear that we wish to broaden our scope, seeing as all of the aspects are truly important.
In terms of your question, France really advocates the use of NGO's. These organizations can be really vital in the implementation of whatever solutions we may propose. We believe that their goals are sound and admirable and we think that if we use NGO's that we can really create lasting resolutions. They ensure the longevity of resolutions and that's what we really want when trying to address these issues.
Mackenzie Austin- France
First off, we would like to thank France for their very well stated ideas as well as their willingness to help take part by supply available help. Speaking from a small nations point of view, green technology is not valued as much by our nations because we feel that there is not point. We have a hard time trying to catch up to developed nations, let alone thining what our economical actions will do to the environment. But that is another direction regarding Globalization.
ReplyDeleteWell examining the current economic problems, Cote D'Ivoire agrees that having these new forms of green technology will be beneficial to the economy. For example, during the 2008 Beijing Olympics the Chines government regulated the uses of only clean air buses as well as other forms of transporttion. This might first appear to be only an environmental solution, but it did however create massive jobs thus aiding to the country's economy. We understand that not all nations have the ability to start a project of such measure, this new green revolution will definitely be successful.
The shift from regular jobs such as engineering has grown to incorporate "green jobs." UNEP has stated in 2008 that by 2030 green jobs can grow as much as 12 million people. It has also predicted the world to shift from oil to natural gas to wind, solar, and geothermal power. This is a great step up, Cote d'Ivoire encourages these ideas and we are willing to contribute to these efforts by changing our ways of energy, but we are asking the help of developed nations of course.
_____
Jobs
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/sci/tech/7634792.stm
Cote d'Ivoire nailed it. While green development should be differentiated from sustainable development, it is important to note that as part of UNEP, environmental policies should be a priority. Sweden is impressed and even moved by Cote d'Ivoire's willingness to adopt green technology. Sweden seeks to contribute green technology to all countries - especially with SymbioCity, an amalgation of 700 Swedish companies with a singular goal of introducing sustainable development through green technology in cities.
ReplyDeleteOn a side note, we're VERY excited for BMUN - we hope to have lots of fun! Everyone seems so smart and even energized for UNEP... hope to see everyone there!
France completely agrees with the comments made by both Sweden and Cote d'Ivoire above in that green technology cannot only create a cleaner environment, but also create jobs for those in developing nations.
ReplyDeleteWe acknowledge Sweden's ambitions to apply green technology to all nations around the world, yet we must remember that the topic is Sustainable Development in Emerging Economies. These countries that we wish to implement green technology in have fragile economies. We cannot expect these nations to put what little money they do have towards a cleaner type of development, when they are just trying to catch up with the rest of the world's economic system in the first place. (If they have the choice between expensive green technology and cheaper polluting technology, the cheaper one will always win) If we look at when the United States was first going through the industrial revolution, no one was trying to impose cleaner energy technologies on to the country (we realize that these technologies weren't developed yet, but it still provides a good example) If these technologies had been imposed on this country their development would have slowed drastically and maybe even have crippled under the costs that they needed to meet. We have to remember that these economies have to become sustainable in a gradual process, and France believes that resolutions with a benchmark program of sorts would really be long-lasting.
France proposes a sliding scale system in which a country can impose greener technologies in accordance to its GDP. When a country's GDP goes up, they would be encouraged to improve their green technologies, and vise versa. This program would ensure the development of sustainable development while also protecting the economy from failing due to the extra costs that come from implementing green technology.
Charlie Hoffman- France
China commends all nations that have expressed their vehement dedication to assuring that countries are implementing sustainable energy. Like many nations, China has an emerging economy, however we have been a leading force in currently updating towards green and environmentally safe energy. We have the world's largest percentage of hydroelectric generators and have recently been focusing on wind and solar energy.We have incorporated investment and renewals in our economic stimulus strategy, and we have been working closely with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change by implementing approximately 70 Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects.
ReplyDeleteWe would like to serve as a role model in the international community; the People's Republic of China is more than willing to aid nations in developing and executing their own sustainable energy projects. The majority of our solutions are very applicable and adaptable to nations that would like to collaborate with us, such as environmentally sustainable infrastructure (The Chinese Construction Plan) and a string focus on implementing the Millennium Development Goals.
As for whaling, the People's Republic of China remains steadfast on an enforced ban. We would like to see the committee focus on the prevention of the extinction of whales, seeing as this is a rapidly increasing issue facing our world today. Several nations located near our nation have been hunting and killing whales along our coast, which is why we are so adamant on an international ban. We have a strict regulation, which is enforced by confiscating the catch, fishing gear and related income and imposing a fine; detaining or revoking the fishermen's license; and bringing to account by administrative means the chief executives of the entities owning the vessels. China has signed onto a memorandum of understanding on joint enforcement of the UN driftnet resolution with the United States, allowing both nations the right to inspect each other's commercial fishing vessels. We would like to bring this onto an international level, and have all nations sign onto this memorandum.
China, first and foremost, would like to see a strictly regulated international whaling ban. We realize, however, that this is a long term goal, and short term solutions must be implemented in order to form and then strengthen the ban. Two of our many solutions include collaborative research and respect to other nation's coastal boundaries. The People's Republic of China firmly believes that our solutions will ultimately result in an enforceable and binding ban of whaling.
Overall, we are greatly looking forward to stimulating debate and diplomatic collaborations with other delegates.
Thank you!
The People's Republic of China
Hello Fellow Delegates
ReplyDeleteMalaysia would like to commend the previous comments on greatly addressing the concerns of global whaling rights and sustainable development. Much focus has been paid, sustainable development in particular here, to the preservation of the environment. Malaysia greatly looks forward to more discussions on alternate ways to develop economically without damaging the environment. Though, one concept of sustainable development has been left out of the light. The issues of economical development and environmental protection are of significant importance, the social factor is still an important part of the three pillars of sustainable development.
Malaysia would simply like to express the social pillar that addresses issues such as illiteracy and especially poverty in emerging economies. One may also need to take note of the social consequences of emerging economies. Looking back at the Industrial Revolutions of the United States and Great Britain, unregulatd child labor was prevalent, slum-like conditions rampant, and labor wages pitifully low. Such atrocities mar the enormous efforts of us as nations that have been committed to making a better world for all.
Essentially, the explosion in economic growth in these emerging, and even developing, nations have brought on much wealth. Unfortunately, the inequality of consumption is extremely appalling in that the poorest 10% of the world consume only 0.5% of the world's private share of consumption, as compared to the riches 10%, who consumes nearly 59% of all consumption. A failure in this wealth to trickle down to the poor has created an ever widening gap between rich and poor. Take for example the nation of Brazil. It has been deemed as an 'emerging economy' as part of the BRIC group. Yet, according to The World Factbook as of 2005, 26% of the nearly 200 millions inhabitants remain below the poverty line.
Malaysia would again like to stress that although aspirations for economical development without environment degradation is admirable, the cost to humanity is unacceptable. Social issues must be addressed similutaneously as well as environmental. Malaysia, with great intent, is eager to participate in the committee and hopes that all aspects of sustainable development may be addressed.
France would like to recognize Malaysia for bringing about a good point in the fact that the social sector of the topic must be addressed seeing that emerging economies have the highest rates of child labor, human rights violations in the workforce etc.
ReplyDeleteFrance has been a leader in the liberalization of the workforce and that is mainly because we see compromise. First of all we recognize that the complete eradication of child labor is quite unfeasible. Though this is an ideal goal and we urge many nations to adopt this policy, we have to realize that there is a difference between voluntary and forced child labor.
On a related note, France would like to encourage many nations to adopt a piece of legislation called the Labor Contract Law. Though western nations see the issue of contracts within the workforce a staple to our culture, many developing nations do not require their businesses to issue them. The implementation of this law would allow for prosecution against human rights violations in the workforce and mediate the scope of the work.
Thanks!
This is Iran, and we're just wondering what the gmail account is that we should send our position papers to.
ReplyDeleteThanks!
Hey Iran!
ReplyDeleteThe gmail is bmun58unep@gmail.com
Submit it with the subject box as: BMUN Position Papers/Iran/ UNEP
Mackenzie Austin- France
Thanks for the help France.
ReplyDeleteHello Delegates,
ReplyDeleteLiechtenstein notes previous countries direction towards energy, but thinks that targeting economy and the workforce are two areas that are predominantly important. Especially in Third World countries where electricity is scarce, the burden of switching to a sustainable energy would prove impossible. Liechtenstein believes that education and elimination of corruption are necessary in improving the economy, and the education will aid the workforce with knowledgeable employees.
As the country with the highest GDP per capita, and relatively low natural resources, Lichtenstein is willing to provide ideas to help upcoming countries embody their own. Liechtenstein's business centered economy has proved profitable and we look forward to improving other economies as well.
Liechtenstein
Hey delegates,
ReplyDeleteAlthough Liechtenstein does arise a good point about the use of energy and the economy,the main aspects of these possible solutions are more geared towards long terms goals. Cote d'Ivoire is not suggesting that long term goals should be suggested, due to the fact that long term goals are improtant but feels that proper action should be taken now.
This is why Cote d'Ivoire feels that by proposing proper solutions geared more towards the enviornment, it can not only improve sustainability but set and overall foundation for long term goals. We truly need to focus on the short term action first before we dig are hands into the heavy long term goals.
Cote d'Ivoire
The Kingdom of Belgium would like to begin by addressing the delegations of France and The People’s Republic of China. France, we would like to commend your post considering how you brought up various key points along with certain solutions to go with. Belgium would simply ask if you could verify and further elaborate your proposed “Sliding-Scale System” and explain how this could aid not only the developed, but most importantly the developing countries.
ReplyDeleteChina, we were very interested when you claimed your country began to install 70 Clean Development Mechanism projects. How do these projects intend to efficiently reduce the harm caused to the environment? Do you as a country believe that this procedure will help make your country become more environmentally friendly? Although China has reduced its coal emissions and boasts a population of 1.3 billion inhabitants, it still remains first on the list of the world’s largest polluters. Furthermore, the Chinese government has yet to associate with the Copenhagen Accord.
Malaysia, the Kingdom of Belgium clearly understands the importance of the side effects, such as child labor, that can be created as a result of countries attempting to keep stride with the powerful developed nations, and their already productive economies. However, this committee is called the United Nations Environmental Program, and the issue you have brought at hand is a humanitarian crisis, therefore it is not our committee’s responsibility to handle this situation. This problem is to be left in the hands of the 3rd Committee: Social, Cultural, and Humanitarian. We must not stray from our own problem, which is the sustainable development of emerging economies. The Kingdom of Belgium believes that Lichtenstein’s proposal to incorporate the economic structure of successful countries into developing nations will not only benefit the developing country to have an economic foundation to expand on, but it will also provide more commercial markets for the already developed nations.
Delegates, this situation has become dire, and in these past blogs, we have spent more than enough time dwelling upon the past. Many people brought the Industrial revolution as an example, however times are different now. “Green technology” and the issue on environmental degradation is a topic of the twentieth century. The past is past, and there is no action that can be taken to rearrange history. Current developing nations cannot take the path the United States took during the Industrial Revolution to currently become the economic powerhouse of the global community, that path is no longer feasible. That is why Belgium sees the only way to success is by moving forward and having all the countries begin to discuss newer methods to help all the developing countries reach economic and environmental stability. To begin with, South American countries such as Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador and Peru, have introduced solar power into their everyday lives, reducing the dependency on coal and wood. By using these solar powers, the South American countries will reduce their air pollution by no longer burning fuel and also saving money by not buying batteries. The saved money can then be distributed to schools and hospitals. Sometimes it could be as easy and simple as installing solar panels, and we the developed nations can speed up this process if we all are willing to donate funds to these countries in need. These developing countries have become dependent on us to help them by providing the money and support in order to commence these programs. Without our aid, these countries will remain weak and powerless, but with our helping hand, they will all strive towards a better standard of living that does not result in the pollution of the environment. Belgium sees that ideas like the one provided above will help drastically change lives across these developing countries and help them take a major step towards the ultimate goal, which is a sustainable, environmental-friendly economy.
Kingdom Of Belgium,
Garen and Edward
The People's Republic of China would like to expand upon our CDM's and bring to the committee's attention that we have recently signed onto the Copenhagen Accord.
ReplyDeleteChina has installed 70 Clean Development Mechanisms, and we fully believe that these are contributing to the reduction of environmental harm. The projects approved by China are aiding us in lowering our greenhouse gas emissions. The majority of the projects are working towards renewable energy, N20 decomposition, energy saving mechanisms. Since China fully believes that renewable energy is vital to sustainable development, we are implementing hydropower, hydroelectric, and wind power projects.
The reason that China had not signed onto the Copenhagen Accord when it was first introduced was because it was putting too much strain on developing nations that are not emitting high levels of greenhouse gases. We believe that nations who produce the most must have higher responsibility when it comes to reversing the damages of greenhouse gases.
As of February 1, 2010, China has been in full support of and signed the Copenhagen Accord. We have pledged to reduce our carbon dioxide emission intensity per unit of GDP by 40 to 45 percent by 2020 (which is a voluntary goal that China proposed to be added on to the agreement), an increase to 15 percent of non-fossil fuels in our total primary energy mix by 2020, an increase of 40 million hectares of forest and 1.3 billion cubic meters of forest levels, and to work with other nations in order to address the climate change.
China clearly recognizes that we are one of the leaders in pollution and greenhouse gas emissions; however, it is proven evident that we are striving towards lowering these levels with the Copenhagen Accord, as well working towards creating sustainable development for future generations.
The United Kingdom would first off like to state that they once again agree upon the issue of placing Sustainable Development for Emerging Economies as the first topic for discussion. Being a developed country gives the United Kingdom many opportunities to help the international community on the issue of emerging economies. In the past, the United Kingdom has been very successful in proving assistance to countries such as Angola, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Somalia. Also being heavily involved with the European Union gives the United Kingdom more influence on providing the necessities to help countries reach sustainability.
ReplyDeleteOn February 1, 2009, the United Kingdom created the Sustainable Development Commission (SDC) in order place a watchdog committee on the Sustainable Development of not just the United Kingdom but a series of countries also. Under the SDC Report of 2009 it states that, “The United Kingdom shall place progression on monitoring targets on the sustainable management of the Government estate and sustainable procurement.” This would therefore allow the United Kingdom to part in an advisory role for different governments. Already, the United Kingdom has been able to bring the Scottish Government and the Welsh Assembly Government closer together in enabling a more efficient role in government.
Within this committee the United Kingdom has seen many great points that have been brought up by many delegations and the chair as well, and would like to address the main concerns. In response to France’s inquiry on what aspects to address within committee, the United Kingdom feels that all social, economical, and environmental factors of sustainable development must be regarded with moreover a stress on the environmental sector. The United Kingdom agrees on the use of alternative energy mainly green technology, but would like to point out that there still remains the question of how to impose such technology for countries that rely on their resources such as oil and kerosene as their main source of energy.
For this reason, the United Kingdom believes that the best option that can be proposed on the issue of alternative energy is actually providing an incentive upon legislature which can be administered throughout the international community. Because the United Kingdom has recently provided funding towards Lebanon’s solar units, the United Kingdom believes that incentives would be the best option for many countries. Furthermore, the United Kingdom looks towards furthering on this issue within committee and, in addition, having a wider debate on the issue of alternative energy.
Next, the United Kingdom would like to bring up a previous statement by Cote D'ivoire in applying long term goals. The United Kingdom feels that this is vital since in reality sustainability takes years to achieve, and therefore long term goals can help benefit a country in the long run. But, the United Kingdom would like to note that short term solutions must still be taken strongly into account on the issue of sustainable development. This is why the United Kingdom has found efficiency in running fact- finding missions regarding the issue of gaining knowledge on a country’s sustainability. This has also allowed more nations to understand the situations that are occurring within countries which are still classified as emerging economies.
Furthermore, the chair previously asked. “What do you think the role of private versus public institutions should be in terms of development? What about public-private relationships?” In response, the United Kingdom believes that it is vital to invest in both public and private institutions including multinational corporations. But, in order for a country to be economically stable, privatization must be taken so that the government has a certain amount of control or “administrative guidance” in private institutions as well. In addition, the United Kingdom feels that it’s necessary to establish public- private relations, and that there must be development and co-ordination in establishing Public Private Partners .Within the United Kingdom, we have developed a Strategic Investment Board Limited (SIB) under Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister (OFMDFM) which works towards developing these relations in aiding the infrastructure of Northern Ireland. Therefore the United Kingdom’s feels that developing nations must work towards establishing similar approaches such as these in working with public and private corporations.
ReplyDeleteNext, the United Kingdom would like to stress a key point brought up by the United Nations Economic and Social Council Resolution on July 28th . It stated that, “effective sustainable development strategies need to pursue an integrated approach to economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainable development, in line with the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, the Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development, the Plan of Implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, and other relevant outcomes of the United Nations conferences and summits.” The United Kingdom strongly affirms this statement and feels that it is necessary to take into account development strategies that have already been recommended through the United Nations in moving forward on developmental programs. Just like the delegation on behalf of Belgium stated, “The only way to success is moving forward.”
Overall, the United Kingdom is very pleased that most countries see that sustainability is important and that this committee is on the right track to helping countries obtain sustainability.
France appreciates that many countries have taken the initiative and discussed that we must work towards a more sustainable world, though we wish to discuss more of the "how we want to achieve this status" rather than "what status we wish to achieve". France believes that there are many more solutions, long-term and short-term, that can deal with the social and economic sustainability of our earth, on top of alternative energy sources. We believe that many nations have provided valuable solutions, though France thinks we can broaden our horizons.
ReplyDeleteOn the topic of incentives, France would like to emphasize that nations are only going to commit to change if they truly want to. Though incentives can provide a valuable form of getting things done, nations are going to attempt to use the most cost-efficient technology, not the most energy-efficient. France believes that incentives can be effective to a certain point but that the initiative to take that step but be present first in our efforts to create a more sustainable world.
Questions have also been brought up about the era when the United States was industrializing and the analogy made there. France would like to clarify in that we didnt mean for others to construe our message and that we only meant that the time for an emerging economy is not easy and we must be willling to give them some slack. Many nations ahve brought up that they wish to look towards the future rather than the past, though France disagrees. Looking towards history can aid us in correcting our mistakes and we believe that a failure to do so can be quite detrimental to our aims as a body.
France would like to commend China and we hope that many other nations follow suit, though we ask if and how these extra costs have curbed your economic development? France would like to stress again that we must gradually implement these solutions into emerging economies, but this must not hinder our transition from an inadequate form of development to a more sufficient one. Our economy is every bit as fragile as the state of our environment, but the cost of not doing anything could be even higher than the cost of implementing a few changes to our way of doing things.
The delegation of Australia would like to commend the United Kingdom for their attention to the need of implementing short term solutions for sustainable development to be recognized just as much as long term ones. In 1992, the transition to a more sustainable nation was officially enacted within Australia through the creation of the National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development. The NSESD focuses on the use and enhancement of resources within every community in order to implement more sustainable and improved life styles. This organization has both long and short-term goals in mind and most importantly, includes the citizens of Australia to take part in preservation and improvement. By educating the citizens on the importance of their community and how progress is dependent on the ecosystem rather than the economy, it gives them an enhanced connection to the importance of their community for present and future generations to come. This allows both urban and rural citizens to partake in creating a more sustainable environment through utilizing and preserving the resources which they are familiar. Therefore, by involving members of communities, a more informed and concerned population may develop leading to immediate as well as long-term effective sustainable progress.
ReplyDeleteAlso regarding the United Kingdom’s/ the chair’s inquiry regarding the relationship between public and private institutions, the delegation of Australia would like to agree with the United Kingdom on the need to establish public-private collaboration. It is highly important within both developed and developing nations that cooperation occurs, especially regarding the sustainability of countries. Also, commenting on the idea of privatization, Australia has only recently acted in the privatization movement (beginning in the late 1990s). However, privatization within Australia is of considerable magnitude; thus, as the United Kingdom stated, it must be done in order to ensure economic stability.
All in all, the delegation of Australia is excited to discuss further on both issues and is looking forward to seeing all of you in a few days.
Cote d'Ivoire
ReplyDeleteDelegates, the nation of Cote d'Ivoire has been reading the blogs and have noticed that many nations have been blogging about on sustainable development in emerging economies.
However, there has been a recent article about whaling all over the news. For instance the nation of Australia, do you realize that your nation has clearly been attacking the nation of Japan on its whaling conflicts. Although Cote d'Ivoire does understand that sustainable development in emerging economies is important, it feels that the topic on whaling rights has been underlooked in this blog spot.
For whaling is most likely occuring right now at this very moment. The Labour's Foreign Affairs Spokesperson, Chris Carter is urging the Government to get behind an Australian proposal to finally phase out whaling. In many cases this has sparked intrest on holding a special meeting of the International Whaling Commission in Florida soon.
On the other hand, whaling nations want to restart commercial hunting of many of these endangered mammals, especially whales. The IWC is said to only have two main solid options on the table in handling this major issue. To elobrate further on the nations of Australia, which since they have not posted anything about there recent actions, there overall position on stoping whaling and attacking whaling is backed by many respected NGOs, one major one including the World Society for the Protection of Animals.
Japan really does need to end its whaling. Many nations have stated, one major one being Australia, that if the nation of Japan does not voluntarily end its whaling programme by November of this year, then nations will take this case to the International Court of Justice.
Cote d'Ivoire feels that many nations in the blog need to seriously think abuot what one nation might do about this proposal against Japan. So the true question to nations is, should whaling truly be allowed anymore?
In response to Cote d'Ivoire's post, the United States would like to make our stance on whaling known. The United States believes that all whaling should ease; however, many countries believe that whaling is an essential part of their economy so the termination of whaling would be impossible. The best that we can do is to let up on whaling enough so that the populations are given enough time to rebuild themselves. The United States recommends that quotas for whale hunting should be lowered annually so the whale population would not decrease as rapidly. Furthermore, we further suggest that whale hunting should be only allowed in certain areas in certain times of the year, so it will prevent over-hunting of one species. In addition, cetacean research centers should be monitored periodically to review researching techniques so that they are humane and involve the least amount of harm to the organisms being studied. Not only are these solutions easily implemented, by they would prove to be effective and beneficial to the world as a whole.
ReplyDelete-United States
Cambodia would first like to apologize for not contributing to this debate earlier.
ReplyDeleteCambodia is shocked at the international community for discussing ideas such as green technology and the implementation of renewable energy sources. Cambodia realizes that the countries that have discussed these things all have good intentions, but when people in rural areas of many countries are losing their livelihoods and do not have access to clean water because of physical environmental degradation, Cambodia cannot sit by and listen to larger countries talk about the different things they want to implement. If countries such as Cambodia are to strengthen their environments and be able to sustain economic growth simultaneously, doesn’t it make sense that the first step we should take is to allow our people access to a clean glass of water every now and then? Green technology for small countries that do not have large populations and do not emit very many emissions is a waste of time and money. If we could reduce the emissions that the larger countries emit by only a small percentage, we would essentially be making an entire smaller country go green. What should be really important to smaller rural nations such as Cambodia are the opportunities that we can give to our people so that they have a chance to strengthen the environment, the economy, and the country at the same time.
And, why has no one spoken about the pressing issue of deforestation?
In Brazil, if the deforestation that was present in the Amazon rainforest were to be stopped, one can only imagine the environmental benefits that would follow. Obviously, Cambodia does not believe that this is a feasible situation in the short term; there will always be at least a small amount of deforestation present on this earth. But why spend time talking about complex green technologies and nuclear reactors when one of the things that we can do in the short term is to prevent illegal logging activities?
We want to work with every nation. But to do that, we have to prioritize. Cambodia realizes that the priorities and goals of larger nations are different from our own. We are entirely ready to accept this fact. Therefore, we propose that larger countries focus on bigger projects that will cut down on emissions and in the long run greatly reduce the effects of global warming. One of the things that larger countries can do is to implement technologies such as nuclear reactors and hydroelectric power where they are applicable. The other technologies stated by other countries and by the chairs also seem like good methods that large countries can take to save their environments.
On the other hand, Cambodia and underdeveloped nations need to do things entirely differently. Even with the help of multiple nations, many energy efficiency programs simply cannot be implemented without a large surplus of money and resources, two things which the world seems to be constantly in demand of. Cambodia will promote programs that will aid in simpler tasks that will jump start slow economies. One of these things is to cut off negative externalities. An example of this is to fund projects such as the enforcement of environmental protection legislation and to create environmental preservation projects. Doing this would passively increase the strength of the environmental and also bolster the earth’s natural defense against global warming. These methods that smaller countries can take are very cost efficient even on a large scale and is the best step that small underdeveloped nations such as Cambodia can take to attack the issue of sustainable development from an environmental perspective.
Regards,
The Kingdom of Cambodia
Hello Once Again Delegates,
ReplyDeleteIn response to Cote d'Ivoire's post of February 25th, Liechtenstein would like to ask whether or not environmental changes are short or long term goals. Seeing that the resources needed to bring on great environmental change are lacking and the great measures that need to be taking, Liechtenstein understands that environmental reformation is truly a long term goal.
This being said, Liechtenstein would like to agree with Cote d'Ivoire in that environmental changes are truly a necessity in developing a sustainable economy. In addition, Liechtenstein would like to reiterate the necessity to attack corruption and improve the education that those in developing nations are receiving. Together these propositions, along with environmental reformation will lead to the development of sustainable economies.
Turning to the issue of whaling, Liechtenstein would also like to agree with the United States' previous post but also notes that many of these propositions have previously been instituted and have not been as effective as the United States calls for. However, Liechtenstein does believe that a monitoring of scientific research of whaling (especially in Japan) is truly a necessity in overcoming this issue.
In addition to what Cote d'Ivoire has stated regarding the Australian front against Japan, Liechtenstein would also like to notify all of the delegates that as of today, it has been made known that Japan hopes to reinstitute commercial whaling at the IWC congregation that begins this Tuesday. Liechtenstein would like to strongly reiterate the necessity to prevent this revival. In order to prevent further and unnecessary whaling, the IWC as well as all of the countries of the delegation must find a balance point upon which Japan can continue whaling, slowly weening away from it as the years go by, and eventually reach a point where no more whaling can occur. This goes for all other countries who hope to continue whaling for the time being.
All in all, Liechtenstein wold like to reiterate that the necessity to stop whaling is there, but the manner in which we do so must include extreme caution in order to avert any unnecessary hostilities.
The delegation on behalf of the United Kingdom would like to thank Cote d'Ivoire for its mention that the topic of Global Whaling Rights has been under looked in this blog. Even though we wish to place Sustainable Development of Emerging Economies first on the agenda, we still view Global Whaling Rights as a very important topic in need of strong recognition.
ReplyDeleteThe United Kingdom for the past fifty years has opposed any sort of whaling. As one of the signatories of the Memorandum of Understanding, the United Kingdom has strongly supported the action plans provided in this document taken towards aiding the numbers of whale species between the waters between Morocco and South Africa. In addition, the United Kingdom has played a leading role in International Whaling Commission (IWC) negotiations and wishes to maintain the international moratorium on commercial whaling. In tackling this issue, however, the United Kingdom feels that harsher measures must be imposed if a nation is to allegedly violate the International Whaling Commission moratorium and any international law that has been placed on whaling.
In 2008, the World Wildlife Fund stated, “We continue to oppose commercial whaling—now and until whale stocks have fully recovered, and the governments of the world have brought whaling fully under international control with a precautionary and conservation-based enforceable management and compliance system in all whaling nations.” The United Kingdom strongly adheres to this statement and therfore feels that it is absolutely vital to enforce management and restriction amongst whaling nations.
The delegation on behalf of Liechtenstein stated that, “As of today, it has been made known that Japan hopes to reinstitute commercial whaling at the IWC congregation that begins this Tuesday.” The United Kingdom has for the past two decades acknowledged Japan’s willingness in committing to commercial whaling, seeing as there have even been claims of whaling solely for “research purposes”. The United Kingdom would like to note that any reinstitution of commercial whaling would require the removal of the current moratorium, and all efforts taken towards this removal, such as the previously proposed Revised Management Scheme (RMS), have failed. The United Kingdom would then like to reiterate that this moratorium is vital in order to both sustain and increase the currently diminished whale population, and if any nation is to discuss the removal of the moratorium they must take into account the RMS which began in 1994 under the IWC and still is ongoing, yet little of any at all progress has been achieved.
In the article titled “Notes on Whaling” the chair stated, “In fact research using genetics and anecdotal reports some point global whale populations may have been around 1.5 million instead of the original 100,000 estimated by the International Whaling Committee. More specifically, researchers estimate that the whale population of New Zealand, a country known for excessive whaling, originally had over 25,000 whales but has been reduced to having a mere 25 reproducing females.” This statement brings much concern and dismay to the United Kingdom. All whales are protected by the law in the United Kingdom’s waters and have been ever since the 1970’s when the United Kingdom banned the increasingly unprofitable whaling and trading of whale products. Statements such as these should only give the international community more initiative to halt any form of whaling, impose harsher measures within their own nation in order to combat whaling, and work towards the establishment of further whaling research efforts.
The delegation on behalf of the United Kingdom would like to thank Cote d'Ivoire for its mention that the topic of Global Whaling Rights has been under looked in this blog. Even though we wish to place Sustainable Development of Emerging Economies first on the agenda, we still view Global Whaling Rights as a very important topic in need of strong recognition.
ReplyDeleteThe United Kingdom for the past fifty years has opposed any sort of whaling. As one of the signatories of the Memorandum of Understanding, the United Kingdom has strongly supported the action plans provided in this document taken towards aiding the numbers of whale species between the waters between Morocco and South Africa. In addition, the United Kingdom has played a leading role in International Whaling Commission (IWC) negotiations and wishes to maintain the international moratorium on commercial whaling. In tackling this issue, however, the United Kingdom feels that harsher measures must be imposed if a nation is to allegedly violate the International Whaling Commission moratorium and any international law that has been placed on whaling.
In 2008, the World Wildlife Fund stated, “We continue to oppose commercial whaling—now and until whale stocks have fully recovered, and the governments of the world have brought whaling fully under international control with a precautionary and conservation-based enforceable management and compliance system in all whaling nations.” The United Kingdom strongly adheres to this statement and therfore feels that it is absolutely vital to enforce management and restriction amongst whaling nations.
The delegation on behalf of Liechtenstein stated that, “As of today, it has been made known that Japan hopes to reinstitute commercial whaling at the IWC congregation that begins this Tuesday.” The United Kingdom has for the past two decades acknowledged Japan’s willingness in committing to commercial whaling, seeing as there have even been claims of whaling solely for “research purposes”. The United Kingdom would like to note that any reinstitution of commercial whaling would require the removal of the current moratorium, and all efforts taken towards this removal, such as the previously proposed Revised Management Scheme (RMS), have failed. The United Kingdom would then like to reiterate that this moratorium is vital in order to both sustain and increase the currently diminished whale population, and if any nation is to discuss the removal of the moratorium they must take into account the RMS which began in 1994 under the IWC and still is ongoing, yet little of any at all progress has been achieved.
In the article titled “Notes on Whaling” the chair stated, “In fact research using genetics and anecdotal reports some point global whale populations may have been around 1.5 million instead of the original 100,000 estimated by the International Whaling Committee. More specifically, researchers estimate that the whale population of New Zealand, a country known for excessive whaling, originally had over 25,000 whales but has been reduced to having a mere 25 reproducing females.” This statement brings much concern and dismay to the United Kingdom. All whales are protected by the law in the United Kingdom’s waters and have been ever since the 1970’s when the United Kingdom banned the increasingly unprofitable whaling and trading of whale products. Statements such as these should only give the international community more initiative to halt any form of whaling, impose harsher measures within their own nation in order to combat whaling, and work towards the establishment of further whaling research efforts.
France would like to respond to a previous post made by Liechtenstein, when they had asked whether our environmental goals woud be long-term or short-term goals, but France would like to ask, Why not both? The issue of our environment in accordance with sustainable development not only must happen in the near future, but for many generations to come as well.
ReplyDeleteIn terms of a previous post made by Cambodia, France would like to be the first to apologize if the blogs earlier didn't truly address the needs of nations like itself and if we offended you by providing alternative energy sources. Though France would like to reiterate that the topic being discussed is Sustainable Development in Emerging Economies, not completely-underdeveloped nations. These natons are on their way towards a more industrialized lifestyle and therefore have already dealt with the many problems that Cambodia brought up earlier. Though Cambodia has made valid points, we have to remember which nations we are dealing with and that for these countries, carbon emissions are at an all time high. In order to solve this issue, France believes that the implementation of alternative energy sources is essential in our attempts to create a more sustainable world.
In terms of Global Whaling Rights, France believes that the 1946 Washington Convention, that was orginally meant to deal with the issues of whaling for scientific research, do not truly reflect the issues that effect us in the 21st century today. It was not intended to be able to sustain the amount of technology that we, as an international community, possess today. Whaling quotas are not controlled by the treaty, but rather the countries themselves. It allows the killing of whales, even though recent studies have proved that tests may be done on those that are live. France believes, that since this is one of the leading documents on scientific whaling, that the stipulations in this agreement must be brought up to date.
Thank You,
France
Regarding sustainable development, India believes that much attention should be given to long-term goals, supported by both short-term and long-term projects. While many sustainable development efforts may require a long period of time, there are positive changes that we can make almost immediately.
ReplyDeleteIn addition, India would like to stress the importance of historical and differentiated responsibilities. Countries that industrialized long ago did so through methods that contributed greatly to the climate change we must presently face. Such countries carry great responsibility in addressing this issue. However, global climate change is a shared challenge for all members of the international community. Steps taken by one country to harness alternative energy or develop sustainably result in benefits that are not confined within a border.
Emerging economies like India are largely focused on addressing poverty and spurring economic growth. Few resources, then, are left to invest in green technology and alternative energy. Yet, such countries are largely affected by environmental degradation and climate change.
India believes in the importance of industrialized countries promoting sustainable development in emerging economies by providing access to green technology and monetary support.
Sustainable development is key to addressing the issue of global climate change. And steps any emerging economy makes to develop sustainably will benefit all members of the international community in the long-run.
Thank you,
India
Hello Delegates,
ReplyDeleteI am so happy to hear from such a diverse group of nations with such a wide range of opinions. Thank you all for responding to this blog, and for continuing to think thoughtfully about the issues at hand.
One thing I would like to address, however, is the discussion on which topic you wish to debate first. Without saying too much, I am going to highly encourage you all to stray from this discussion a bit and focus on more substantive comments in this forum. I am glad to learn that you are all excited for debate, but in true BMUN tradition, there may be some outside forces in the works which might inspire the way that the agenda will be set. So, if from here on out, I would encourage you to focus your comments on addressing points brought up either by the chairs in the blog, or by your fellow delegates in this forum.
And thanks for the high quality research papers. We're looking forward to hearing from you all this weekend.
Cheers,
Beth
Hi my name is Sara chehrazi. I am from St. Francis High School and I'm representing Cameroon. See you all this weekend.
ReplyDeleteIt has been mentioned by multiple delegates that Australia has adopted a strong stance against Japanese whaling and plans to take proactive measures to prevent it. However, Kuwait hopes that this committee does not turn a blind eye to the fact that Australia is facilitating Japanese whaling by permitting Japanese whalers to charter Australian planes, on Australian territory and over Australian seas, in order to monitor anti-whaling activists, such as Greenpeace, and avoid them.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.theage.com.au/national/japanese-whalers-can-charter-australian-planes-20100220-oms4.html
-Kuwait
Hi all,
ReplyDeleteCongrats on BMUN 58! You all did a fantastic job this week-end and I sincerely meant everything I said about you being the BEST COMMITTEE of my BMUN experience ever. I hope you all return to BMUN 59 and perhaps that any of you graduating seniors consider coming to Cal.
If you have not received your position papers and/or grading rubrics, please let me know and I'll get back to you ASAP.
Cheers,
Beth